Uno studio sul bilancio pubblico partecipato a Bel Horizonte. Scritto da Rafael Cardoso Sampaio, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Center for Advanced Studies on Electronic Government andDigital Democracy (CEADD), Rousiley Celi Moreira Maia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Research Group in Media and Public Sphere (EME), Francisco Paulo Jamil Almeida Marques
Universidade Federal do Ceará. Mostra come in una struttura che spinge a porre i problemi decisionali in modo sensato e profondo, la discussione diventa rispettosa delle posizioni degli altri e costruttiva. È un aspetto della relazione tra internet e democrazia che potrebbe diventare particolarmente importante.
Ecco l’abstract:
This paper aims to examine how political conversations take place on the digitaldiscursive tools offered as part of the Digital Participatory Budget (OPD) in Belo Horizonte (Brazil).The authors propose an analytical model based on deliberative theories in order to investigate thediscussions over this participatory program. The main sample consists of the messages posted bythe users (n=375) on the commentaries section. The results show that reciprocity and reflexivityamong interlocutors are rare; however, the respect among the participants and the justificationlevels in several arguments were high during the discussion. The authors conclude that, even in asituation in which there is no empowerment of the digital tools, the internet can effectively provideenvironments to enhance a qualified discursive exchange. In spite of low levels of deliberativeness,the case study shows that there are important gains concerning social learning among theparticipants.
Vedi anche:
I temi emergenti nella riflessione sulle innovazioni possibili nella pratica politica, con il supporto della rete 16 luglio
Commenta