|
|
Lunedì, 29 dicembre 2008
|
|
| |
Ultime notizie...
PewResearch: i siti superano i giornali come fonte di notizie
Inquisitr: i pericoli delle notizie in tempo reale
BusinessWeek: giornali online sostenuti con le donazioni
5:52:49 PM  ;
|
|
Edge. Economisti
Una raccolta di opinioni su Edge sul rapporto tra scienza ed economia. Esempi:
DOUGLAS
RUSHKOFF: The greatest danger of this compromised and arbitrary "scientific-style" approach to economics is that it implies an
equivalence of the economy with nature.
MIKE BROWN: I think the main thing science has to offer in this crisis right now is a
little dose of its traditional empirical humility
GEORGE
DYSON: "Ten years ago I started a company based on the assumption that
people are basically good," argued E-Bay founder Pierre Omidyar (at the
Santa Fe Institute) in 2004. "And now I have the data to prove it."
Instead of putting a dozen scientists in a room to come up with a
better model of the existing global financial system, we
should put a dozen Pierre Omidyars, Elon Musks, Salar Kamangars, and
Jeff Bezoses in a room (with Danny Hillis) and let them actually build one (a new financial system, not another model).
EMANUEL
DERMAN: This is a noble proposal, but I remain a bit of a skeptic with
respect to the ability of a cohort of scientists and economists to find
a scientific solution to the problems of our economy. Economies are
living organisms, about as old as the oldest profession, and rebuilding
the economic system from scratch is a problem in engineering and social
engineering, not in science. Human's and scientists don't have a good
history as regards social engineering.
MICHAEL
SHERMER: Expand the problem by many orders of magnitude and we get a
sense of the breathtaking inanity of trying to control an entire
economy, no matter how smart the experts in our hypothetical economic
Manhattan Project may be. The economy is a product of human action, not of human design. Trying to redesign something that was never designed in the first place is futile. I vote no on an economic Manhattan Project.
5:26:48 PM ;
|
|
Who nose?
 Si avvicina il momento in cui sarà obbligatorio scrivere del futuro, solo perché tutti prevedono - con qualche certezza - che tra poco comincerà un nuovo anno.
Sicché i giornali si preparano a questa incombenza. Qualcuno con maggiore precisione. Da consultare per esempio l'Economist.
Ma lo strumento principale per avere un'idea di dove andare a parare quando si deve scrivere del futuro resta quello di sempre.
Quindi non resta che chiedersi: who nose?
4:06:41 PM ;
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2009
Luca De Biase.
Last update:
1-01-2009; 1:24:48.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves
(blue) Manila theme. |
|
Appunti su economia e felicità
In libreria:
Economia della Felicità
Dalla blogosfera
al valore del dono
Feltrinelli Editore
Il mago d'ebiz
In nome del popolo mondiale
Frammenti
  
Crossroads
Nòva100
(Nòva24Ora!)
Rivolta e rivoluzione
Giornalismo dell'innovazione
Appunti: reti, Benkler, Castells
Politica/ blog
Politica/ scienza
Retorica catastrofica
Scienza/ paura
Informazione/ comunicazione
Regole/ telecomunicazioni
Urgenze/ giovani
Chi ha ucciso i giornali?
Online journalism
Commons
Planisfero personale
First Monday
Ted
Seed Magazine
Reporters sans Frontières
EquiLiber
Doors of perception
Newseum
Jornalismo & internet
Discussioni
twitturly
Future Exploration
CiteUlike
LibraryThing
Ted
Digital Library of the Commons
On the Commons
Memesphere
Wikio
|
